politicsWikipedia
India's Supreme Court ended a decades-old fight over Ayodhya's holy site
On 9 November 2019, a five-judge bench of India's Supreme Court delivered a unanimous verdict on the Ayodhya dispute, one of the country's longest-running legal fights. The case concerned a 2.77-acre site in Ayodhya that many Hindus regard as the birthplace of Rama and where the Babri Masjid, built around 1530, stood until it was demolished in 1992. The court ruled that the land should go to a trust to build a Hindu temple, and ordered five acres elsewhere to be given to the Sunni Waqf Board for a mosque. It found the 1992 demolition was illegal, and relied in part on archaeological findings that the mosque was built on a non-Islamic structure. The ruling ended a title dispute that had run for decades.
The verdict settled a legal question that had shaped Indian politics and communal relations since the 1980s. Supporters saw justice done and closure; critics questioned parts of the reasoning, and others saw it as a pragmatic end to a long conflict.
Disputes over sacred sites that touch national identity, like Jerusalem's Temple Mount or the Hagia Sophia, often end in courts or political deals rather than agreement, and rulings are accepted by some and criticised by others.
The Supreme Court of India has operated from its building in New Delhi since 1958.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · text CC BY-SA 4.0
Image: Wikimedia Commons
