mind & bodyWikipedia

People give more to one named victim than to a large group with the same need

the gist

The identifiable victim effect is the tendency to offer more help when a specific, identifiable person is in hardship than when a large, vaguely defined group faces the same need. It has two parts: people prefer to help one identified victim over an unidentified one, and a single identified victim over a group of identified victims. Economist Thomas Schelling wrote that harm to a particular person stirs anxiety, guilt and sentiment, while statistical death barely does. Researchers have also found the mirror image, the identifiable perpetrator effect, in which people punish a named wrongdoer more harshly. Scholars count the effect as a bias because helping N unidentified victims should produce N times as much aid.

so what

It explains why charities use individual stories and why statistics often fail to move people. It is a reminder that compassion can be unevenly distributed, which matters for public policy and giving.

fun fact

The line One death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic is widely attributed to Stalin, though it is incorrectly attributed to him.

more on this

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · text CC BY-SA 4.0