pop & funanalysisThe Conversation: Netflix1971 · Stanford, California, USA

Stanford prison experiment: why do controversial psychology studies still have such a hold on us?

the gist

In 1971 Philip Zimbardo turned a Stanford basement into a mock prison and randomly assigned 24 male students to be guards or prisoners for a planned two weeks. He stopped it after six days because some guards had become cruel and some prisoners had broken down. Critics now argue that guards were given instructions on how to behave, so their cruelty was not spontaneous, and that some prisoners later said they had exaggerated their distress. Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments at Yale in the early 1960s had a similar fate: 65% of participants in the first version went to the top of a shock scale when an authority figure told them to continue, though the shocks were fake. Defenders such as Alex Haslam and Stephen Reicher argue participants stayed on because they believed in the scientific cause, while critics say that explanation ignores what was said during the sessions.

so what

These studies shaped how psychologists and the public understand authority and conformity, and they still appear in textbooks and new media. Their flaws show how a dramatic result can outlast the evidence behind it. Whatever the verdict on the methods, the core question about how ordinary people behave under authority remains open.

fun fact

Zimbardo later served as president of the American Psychological Association.

The Conversation

Illustrative photo · Philip Zimbardo, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons