mind & bodyanalysisThe Conversation: Arts + Culture (US)
An eye for an eye: People agree about the values of body parts across cultures and eras
Across cultures and centuries, people tend to rank body parts in a similar order of value. A study of 614 people in the United States and India found that lay judgements about how much a body part matters matched compensation set by old and modern laws. Participants valued the index finger above the ring finger and one eye above one ear, as ancient codes and modern workers' compensation schedules do. The values also track function: losing several of one part counts as worse than losing one, and losing a whole limb is worse than losing one part of it. The researchers suggest that these shared intuitions help underpin laws about bodily harm across time and place.
It suggests some legal ideas about harm may rest on widely shared human intuitions rather than only on local custom, challenging the view that law is purely cultural. Compensation for injury has appeared in societies from Mesopotamia to Tang dynasty China.
The Code of Ur-Nammu, written about 4,100 years ago in ancient Nippur, set fixed silver payments for injuries such as a cut nose or a knocked-out tooth. Similar compensation systems, known as wergild in Germanic societies, appeared in many cultures, showing a long-running pattern of putting prices on bodily harm.
The Conversation
Illustrative photo · Eike von Repgow, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
