politicsWikipedia
A law meant to protect endangered species can push landowners to destroy their habitat
The US Endangered Species Act of 1973 places development restrictions on landowners who discover endangered species on their property. Although the law protects wildlife in many ways, it creates a perverse incentive. Landowners who fear that a species might appear later may drain swamps or cut down trees that could host it, so that their land stays free for development. In some cases, endangered animals have been deliberately killed to avoid discovery. Economists and policy writers use this example to show how rules can produce the opposite of their intended effect when they change what people gain by hiding or removing the very thing being protected.
The case is a classic illustration of incentives. Good environmental policy has to consider how property owners will respond, not only what the rule says, and this has shaped later debates about conservation rewards.
background
The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.) is the primary law in the United States for protecting and conserving imperiled species. Designed to protect critically imperiled species from extinction as a "consequence of economic growth and development untempered by adequate concern and conservation", the ESA was signed into law by President Richard Nixon on December 28, 1973. The U.S. Supreme Court described it as "the most comprehensive legislation for the preservation of endangered species enacted by any nation". The purposes of the ESA are two-fold: to prevent extinction and to recover species to the point where the law's protections are not needed. It therefore "protect[s] species and the ecosystems upon which they depend" through different mechanisms.
From Wikipedia: Endangered Species Act of 1973 (CC BY-SA 4.0) ↗From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · text CC BY-SA 4.0
Illustrative photo · U.S. Government, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
