mind & bodyWikipedia1971 · Stanford, California, USA
The Stanford prison experiment was halted after six days, and its conclusions are now heavily disputed
In August 1971, Philip Zimbardo at Stanford University ran a planned two-week simulation of prison life, recruiting college men who were randomly assigned as prisoners or guards. Guards were given uniforms and told to keep prisoners from escaping, and the study began when the prisoners were arrested by real police. Abuse by some guards escalated over five days, and Zimbardo ended the study on the sixth day after a psychologist challenged the conditions. He concluded that the situation roles had shaped behaviour. Later critics argued the guards were coached and that the results were shaped in advance, claims that Zimbardo disputed.
Volunteers were assigned roles at random, and guards were given uniforms and sunglasses to reduce their sense of individuality. Zimbardo argued that the structure of the setting, rather than personality, drove behaviour. Critics say the guards were encouraged in specific ways, which undermines that conclusion.
The study shaped how people think about roles, power and situations, but it is now a case study in research ethics and scientific rigour. It helped prompt universities to tighten rules for human research subjects.
Participants were recruited through a newspaper ad offering US$15 a day in 1971.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · text CC BY-SA 4.0
Photo: Eric. E. Castro, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
