mind & bodyWikipedia
Safety features often lead people to take more risks, a pattern called risk compensation
Risk compensation is the theory that people adjust their behaviour to the level of risk they perceive, becoming more careful when they sense danger and less careful when they feel protected. The effect is usually smaller than the real benefit of a safety measure, but it can cancel out some of that benefit or even increase risk. Economist Sam Peltzman studied car safety and the effect is often called the Peltzman effect. Motorists were observed driving closer to the vehicle in front when their cars had anti-lock brakes, for example. Evidence also suggests that risk compensation may help explain why condom distribution programmes did not reverse HIV prevalence in some settings, since people may take more sexual risks when they feel protected. In contrast, shared space street design deliberately raises perceived risk and uncertainty, which encourages drivers to slow down and can reduce injuries. The result is a counterintuitive lesson: a safer environment can make people behave less cautiously.
People hold a rough sense of acceptable risk. When a safety feature lowers the perceived danger, they spend some of that margin on speed, closeness or other risky choices, so the net gain is smaller than the engineering suggests.
Risk compensation means safety policy has to account for how people will respond, not just the engineering. It helps explain why some safety measures deliver less benefit than expected and why designers sometimes add visible risk on purpose.
Economist Sam Peltzman's 1975 study of car safety regulation first described the pattern, and shared space street design applies the same logic in reverse.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · text CC BY-SA 4.0
Illustrative photo · Open Risk, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
