arts, ideas & societyThe Conversation: Arts + Culture (US)2021–2022 · USA

Whether it’s banning books or preventing Macklemore from touring, silencing artists often backfires

the gist

A large study of library circulation found that attempts to ban books often make them more popular. The researchers examined monthly borrowing records across 38 US states from January 2021 to June 2022, comparing banned books with similar titles that were not challenged. On average, circulation rose by 12 percent in the six months after a ban. The boost was concentrated among lesser-known authors, and each additional school district removing a book added roughly 2 percent more circulation. Even states without the ban saw circulation rise by about 11 percent. The effect is known as the Streisand effect, named after Barbra Streisand's failed 2003 attempt to remove aerial photos of her home from the internet. The timing matches the recent news cycle around Macklemore being dropped from Ed Sheeran's tour.

so what

The data backs up the Streisand effect with evidence rather than folk wisdom. It suggests that censorship can extend the reach of a book well beyond the place where it was challenged.

more on this

background

The Streisand effect is the phenomenon in which an attempt to hide, remove, or censor information results in the unintended consequence of the effort instead increasing public awareness of the information.

From Wikipedia: Streisand effect (CC BY-SA 4.0) ↗

The Conversation

Illustrative photo · Required attribution is: Copyright (C) 2002 Kenneth & Gabri…, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons