mind & bodyWikipedia1964
The bystander effect was sparked by a 1964 murder, but its evidence is now questioned
The bystander effect is the social psychology finding that people are less likely to help a victim when other people are present. It was first proposed in 1964 after the murder of Kitty Genovese, when a newspaper reported that 37 bystanders had seen or heard the attack without calling for help, a figure that was later found to be wrong. Laboratory research has examined factors such as the number of bystanders, ambiguity about what is happening, group cohesion and diffusion of responsibility. When one person is asked to act alone, they feel responsible and usually respond, while in groups each person feels less responsible and may hold back. Recent studies of real-world events captured on security cameras have questioned how consistent and strong the effect is. Later work also suggests it can extend to workplaces, where subordinates often keep ideas and concerns from managers.
When someone needs help, each person present has to decide whether the responsibility is theirs. The more people there are, the more the responsibility is divided, and each individual may assume someone else will act or fear acting wrongly in front of others.
The bystander effect explains why emergencies can go unanswered even in crowded places, and it shows how responsibility spreads thin in groups. Because its strength is now debated, it is also a good case study in how a famous psychological idea can outlast the evidence behind it.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · text CC BY-SA 4.0
Illustrative photo · Kulkarni2022, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
